We already learned about the concept of the traditional factory school and why that model will always result in underachieving children; because it is designed to create identical results regardless of potential or capacity. We also learned that skipping a grade has scientifically proven benefits even though some people argue that it creates social or self-esteem issues or places undue stress on children. Let's talk more about the benefits.
As I mentioned in the previous article: Evidence shows that children who skip grades achieve more than the children they left behind, and surpisingly, even more than the older children they join. Of children who have the same IQ and same age before the skip, those who do skip dominate in achievement tests over those who don't -- a permanent increase in IQ, which is normally thought to be fixed. Students who skip also rate better socially and emotionally than those who don't and have higher self-esteem.
What causes these benefits? Here are five causes.
-
They gain ambition and motivation. Children who skip grades are much more likely to join advanced programs in later school years and pursue higher education, along with all the increased earnings and career benefits. Most importantly for their character, they realize that success is not easy. Studies show that children who earn good grades with relative ease become conditioned to success. They slip into a mindset that can last a lifetime; a mindset of doubt in their real-world abilities to solve problems they haven't seen before. People with this afflication play-it-safe, avoiding challenge and learning opportunities, preferring to stick to their stengths and guaranteed success but living a fearful and stagnant life at the same time (Dweck 2000, 2006, 2012).
-
They stop wasting time. If your child is getting straight A's with minimal effort then they are wasting practically all their time every day. They are learning nothing. Nothing, that is, except that they should expect to get outstanding results without effort, which causes those huge mindset problems later on. Consider that if your child skips a grade then they literally get an extra year of life. In the meantime, they spend all those other years learning more.
Consider also, that the child is learning to slow themselves down and procrastinate. When they get a boring sheet of math problems or other make-work assignment that's due at the end of class but takes only a few minutes to complete then the child settles into some other activity. I'm lucky because my child reads or draws, but he could just as easily become a disruption as his idle brain struggles to entertain itself. However, even though my child reads which is a good thing and gives him enjoyment, he is now optimizing his fun by creating more reading time. As a result, he doesn't check his work or even take any pride in it. He either rushes through beforehand or reads first and them leaves himself just enough time to slam down answers. The silly case of the smart kid performing worse!
-
They actually get smarter. IQ is thought to be an objective measure of intelligence that doesn’t change. It's scaled to the age of the child. As a simple example: If the average child only learns to add at age 5, but your child knows this at age 4, then your child has an IQ of at least 125 (5 is 1.25 of 4) in adding.
Studies show that children who skip a grade quickly fill in all their knowledge gaps as they adapt into the new grade. On IQ tests they score at least as well, and often higher, than others in their new grade. This is a permanent increase in IQ as if the child were one year older than they are. This effect is not seen when children are not skipped because the factory school model whittles away potential rather than realizing it (Wells 2009).
-
They benefit from the Pygmalion and Halo effects. One famous early study by Roesnthal and Jacobsen included an experiment in which teachers were told that a group of randomly selected individuals were smarter than average when they were not. After the school year finished, IQ testing determined that those previously average children had indeed gained in IQ as a result of subconcious teacher expectations improving the interactions (Rosenthal, 1964, 1973). Halo effect is another bias in which people subconciously apply information to other areas, such as percieving children who they expect to be smart as being better behaved even if there is no difference in actual behavior.
Both of these effects confer real advantages to students that teachers know have skipped grades. Get your child those advantages.
-
They benefit socially and have higher self-esteem. The most common objection to skipping grades is the worry that the child is not ready to engage with older children or won't be able to handle the stress of the new grade. In reality none of it matters. By the time they become adults children who skip and those who don't are both equally happy and well adjusted. When asked if they regretted skipping a grade most regretted not skipping more. It does make a difference at the time though. Children who have just skipped do indeed experience some stress as they adapt into the new grade, but improved self esteem quickly replaces stress because the child has proven to themselves that they are more capable than their peers.
Most articles that talk about grade skipping say it's for "gifted" kids. I don't believe it. First of all, I believe that any young child can easily be coached into testing at a gifted level by caring parents. Second I think that skipping grades is so beneficial that any “average” child should try it. See the next article for my plan on how to do it.
Sources:
Dweck, Carolyn. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success (2007) or Self-theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development (Essays in Social Psychology) (2000)
Wells, Ryan. What Factors Are Associated With Grade Acceleration? (2009)
Rosenthal, Pygmalion in the classroom: teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. (1964, 1992 update) [A brief and update].

Comments
There are some interesting
There are some interesting points here, but I'm uncomfortable with the impression that it's good across the board. You don't really address the social aspects of school, and this is important. My children are fortunate to be in a public Montessori school that teaches to individuals rather than to the level of the group, so my son who is starting full day kindergarten but is already reading and doing math at a third grade level is doing work appropriate to his skills while still remaining with his peer group. Academically I know my son will excel regardless of where he is, but school is more than that. All three of my kids are on the older end of the age cutoff for when they could start school, and I debated getting them tested to start early, but the more people and teachers I talked to made me decide against it. It's hard being younger than most of the people in your class, particularly when down the line smaller size, maturaty, and age affects athletics, dating, and driving. Younger kids in a class had more social struggles, which can also in turn affect academic achievement as well.
Caveat: If your child is in
Caveat: If your child is in a mastery learning situation where instruction and practice are tailored to the child's level then there is no benefit from skipping grades, since that type of education comes much closer to developing the child's potential. You've noticed this in you child's achievement. This is advice to people who are faced with the conventional school system, so it doesn't apply to you. But I'll answer anyway as though it did :)
I agree with you that it is hard to determine the social risks because they aren't easy to quantify like a test score is. However, believe the evidence is there because grown-ups who skip regret not skipping more according to the research, they don't regret the skipping. As well, although during school there may be some periods of lower reported social well-being, usually before long and certainly by the time they are out of school, they report equal or better well being.
I was told EXACTLY the same things by my principal yet I find that my child has not changed at all personality-wise or socially. I think what you are quoting is the heresay and folk evidence of like I was given, by people who knew someone or saw someone skip and was miserable. The fact is, that person who was miserable likely would have been miserable anyway. If you remember back to your own school I'm sure you knew kids who were happy, friendly, bullies, victims, cool, nerdy. These variations were not caused by skipping, but are the normal variations in a population. Let me know if I'm wrong.
You mention social issues affecting academic issues: That is strongly contradicted by evidence, which shows that children who skip become smarter during their school time.
Now, your point when you say "School is more than that" is one that I struggle with. My view is that school is a service to teach, and I don't want them to fully raise my children or babysit my children -- I selfishly want to reserve that for myself. But I know that I could just as easily argue that school is a place where children play and that school should mainly be a fun place ... therefore why not keep them there as long as possible? Many people view their childhoods as the best times of the their lives, me included! So when you say that, I agree with you. I can see how someone could view school as a place mainly to play and enjoy life, and I sometimes have that view myself. To me that is the question to weigh when considering prolonging school.
Oh, I understand that our
Oh, I understand that our situation deviates from the norm, but I felt it was important to mention, plus even in a Montessori environment people have asked me if I have considered moving my son up a grade or two. But it is that "School is more than that" question that I ponder a lot, too. I suppose I don't see school entirely in terms of academics. If my kids were scoring off the charts because information had been pounded into them, but they had no joy in learning, then that's not a good education in my opinion. My brothers and I attended public schools near Detroit. From a strictly academic standpoint we were not handed the best opportunities but we all went on to do well in college (my brothers to ivy league schools and they are both associate professors today, and I am a luthier who runs my own business). Real success in education happens more often based on what happens at home. My kids will learn because their parents love to learn and want to share things with them. The benefit of going to school to learn things there is that they get to interact with more people on their own and figure out how to navigate the world without my guiding everything. They get perspectives they wouldn't get from me. They form bonds that may last a lifetime, and memories that belong to them that I don't have a part in. I think those things are underrated as part of the decision to send kids to school. In terms of the anecdotal evidence about fitting in, it was all firsthand from people who were young in their class and found it hard to be picked last for teams because they were a year smaller, or the last one in their peer group to drive or get into certain movies. I know it's not scientific data, but some things are also hard to measure. I just think you still have to make the call based on the individual child, despite evidence or data of any kind. One for whom academic success is the greatest motivation should certainly be in the best place available for it. But another child may be okay to supplement learning elsewhere in exchange for remaining with a peer group that makes him or her happy.
But I know I'm probably not typical. I expect school to be safe, enjoyable, and inspiring. Beyond that I believe the academics will sort themselves out.
I don't think the question of
I don't think the question of skipping a grade even makes sense in an environment like you describe your children are in. I think you are doing a great job for your children. What you are doing is probably a lot better than skipping a grade, so to you it probably seems like skipping a grade is a bad choice and it probably would be. I do have a couple of comments about some of your points though, where we probably disagree a little.
You say that "Real success in education happens more often based on what happens at home.": Evidence indicates the opposite. It's more like what happens at home does not matter for the most part; as long as you have a somewhat normal home environment. The benefits from having good parents come from who the parents ARE. You are 100% right when you say "My kids will learn because their parents love to learn". You also recognize that "If my kids were scoring off the charts because information had been pounded into them ..." it would not be a good outcome ... and it stands a good chance of not working if it isn't true to the family.
Parents have a strong influence on their children in the early years, when the child's environment is the home. But afterwards, the children are raised by their school and their friends more and more. That's one of the reasons that I want my children to move through school and out more quickly.
Personal anecdotes are a sneaky thing. Ask anyone about anything and they usually don't know why they do anything of why anything happened. They will make up a story because you asked. Very evident in research. Have a look at studies on expertise and you will find that experts cannot tell others how they do what they do because they don't know, but they do tell people anyways and believe their own stories :) I can dig up some references if you want.
I really like what you said about the benefits of school being to interact with others and make memories and be happy. A great reason to keep kids in school and I have good memories from school. My opinion is, socially and economically, school is an expensive and complicated way of making that happen. Also, I only have two close friends left from elementary or junior high, or even high school, which is more I think than most people. What should I take away from that stat?
Great discussion, and I hope I'm not coming off strong. Again, I believe that you are doing a wonderful job, but I'm trying to show that skipping grades isn't full of social and emotional pitfalls but rather benefits.
Not too strong at all! I
Not too strong at all! I love a good discussion, that's why I enjoy your site.
I think if I were sending my kids into any environment where I felt I needed to rush them out of it, it's not the right environment to begin with. I agonized about where to send my kids and feel lucky they are where they are, but if at any point I felt their spirits were being crushed I would pull them out in a heartbeat.
My dearest friends are all still the same ones from high school, and I even keep in touch with people I met in kindergarten, so maybe my perspective is different on that point. I had an excellent chemistry teacher but I can't tell you anything I learned in that class. I can tell you how much fun it was writing notes to a boy at my desk there, though. When you ask people about formative experiences in school they are seldom academic in nature. It's a first kiss or a mean kid or moment that made them laugh until they couldn't breathe. The science teacher who most inspired one of my brothers (who is now a neuroscientist) did so by helping him with a project for a competition after school even though it meant missing a trip to Hawaii with his family. The science was important, but the act of generosity from that man was even more so.
I think I am officially rambling, so I will stop now! Anyway, as usual, I think your children are lucky to have such a thoughtful parent. Thanks for giving me some new angles to consider.
I know what you mean about
I know what you mean about the teachers! My grade 4 teacher went to my wedding, and I have Mr Penny and Mr Desorcy in science who taught me so much and influenced my thinking. And it was super fun kicking the ball onto the school roof or daring my buddy to eat poo.
You've incented me to delve a little more into the research on emotional and social well-being. I'm not that convinced that skipping grades changes that a lot, but you've opened my eyes that it is an important topic. I was super-cool in grade 1-2, sorta cool up grade 6, not cool to grade 9, then back up to below average in high school. Now I'm over that though :) I had so many girlfriends in Grade 1 and I do still remember one who I gave a found eraser too. It was a really nice eraser with the pink for pencil and the blue for ink.
My idealized environment is a bit inspired by thinking about tribal people, who are basically like a large family, with everyone just learning by participating in the real world and experiences of those people. School seems so fake. Ship the kids off to one place and ship the parents off to another, then ship them all back so they can spend a couple of hours -- many times just watching tv. Bleh. I had a look at your site and I don't think you live that way!
Congratulations on having excellent people in your life!
Forgot to say: Thanks for
Forgot to say: Thanks for the awesome comment!
My brother was given the
My brother was given the opportunity to skip a grade in elementary school, but my mom declined the offer. I always wondered what would have happend if my brother had skipped a grade. He was definitely smart enough to be a doctor, but he was never challenged in his classes and therefore never had the drive needed to pursue a medical career.
In any case, I completely agree that skipping a grade can be beneficial, especially when you factor in the study mentioned, which indicated that teachers favor the students that they already think are smart. Fascinating stuff!
I'm exactly like your brother
I'm exactly like your brother. Had the chance to skip grade 3, but parents didn't. Then I totally wasted Jr High, part of high school, and most of undergrad. Took until grad school until I recovered some drive.
Thanks for the comment!
I think you bring up some
I think you bring up some very good points. A couple questions: What about uneven achievement? Some kids are way ahead in reading, but at or behind grade level in math, or vice versa. In that situation, do you think it's best to skip up all together, or do skip up for some subjects and not others?
Also -- what kind of feedback/response have you gotten from your kids' school re skipping grades? Some schools seem open to the idea. Others (and some specific teachers and principals) seem to object.
What about the social factor -- if your kid really very strongly wants to stay with the kids in his class? While I def. agree that there can be social benefits to skipping ahead, I think it depends on the kid, the environment, and how far ahead.
You know I'm a fan of homeschooling, and one of the things I like most about it is that you can tailor learning to the kid. If they're ready to fly in one subject, they can fly. If they need more time on another concept, they can take their time. And socialization can occur with people of all ages and stages. Plus, you don't have to fight with/go through the levels of bureaucracy that are often required to tweak your kids' education in school.
Thanks for interacting
Thanks for interacting Jennifer: I read your blog often. Let me answer the questions.
Uneven Achievement: The ideal school would have each student and each subject working at their level, then there would be no reason to skip. In my school system there is not really a way to enrich just one subject because the teachers have limited flexibility. Then we just run into the problem the next year anyway when the child moves up. My opinion is that challenge is better, and both my wife and I are involved parents who are "into" education so between the two of us we can teach our kids up to university level in all the core subjects. My goal is to get the child challenged at school and we'll work a little extra if needed on the weaknesses, rather than have the child challenged in the one area they're weak in at school but bored for all the rest. Parents and teachers work together on uneven achievement. It's just so sad when a child excels at something and is interested, but can't progress because it just isn't in the curriculum.
Feedback from my school: They resisted until I pushed to get him tested, then they did it immediately because it was so obvious that he was not going to be challenged in grade 2. But I don't care if they object. I go into the conferences knowing where they come from. They have a job to do, and they have to meet the needs of most. So I brainstorm with them about what to do within their limits for my child. However, they didn't deliver on their promises to give my child special side proejcts and enrichment, which is why I changed tactics to skip him up.
Social Factor: I'm going to seem a bit cruel, but it doesn't really matter in the long run. That's what we learn in economics: Nothing is stable in the long run. Humans value loss more than gain, and especially hate to trade certain loss for uncertain gain. So yes, the child will be sad to leave friends and will be frightened to enter the new situation. I GUARANTEE that this is better for the child in the long run. The studies support that. Almost definintely, if the child has a lot of friends, then they will feel some negative emotions prior to the skip and for a while afterwards. But these go away, and there are the benefits of more practice making new friends, a better relationship with the teacher, and the increases in intelligence.
I think many people who object on the basis of social well-being think that the child will become socially challenged in the new environment because they are socially challenged in the current environment. Think about it this way, if the child gained a lot of friends in the current grade, then they are probably the type who can gain a lot of friends in any environment. And if the child has difficulty making friends, then yes, they will probably continue to have difficulty. But are they worse off?
Home schooling: I agree, home schooling is excellent as long as the parents are good. I've seen a lot of homeschoolers do the opposite of fly because it wasn't really homeschooling that was going on. My wife ran a homeschooling science and math enrichment program there were huge differences in the children. You know what else: I'm not really that sure too much education is required for everyone. 12 years is a lot, and perhaps some kids just want a different life. Working on a farm or running a business or being in a trade ... you don't need much K-12 for that, you need different skills that aren't even taught in school. That's the problem with a one or few-stream school.
Again, thanks for writing this, I'm happy we talked on the comments. I like your blog a lot!
If your anxiety is not severe
If your anxiety is not severe or you are already in treatment for SAD, there are a number of coping strategies that you can use to help alleviate social anxiety in meetings at work. read this
I've seen so many kids
I've seen so many kids depressed and unhappy in school being volunteer mom and its all because they don't have simple reading skills. I was determined not to let my children feel like this in the place their supposed to be excited to learn in. This gave me the tools and tips I needed to give my kids the best chance at success in school and later in life: http://teachyourchildtoread.blogspot.com/
I've seen so many kids
I've seen so many kids depressed and unhappy in school being volunteer mom and its all because they don't have simple reading skills. I was determined not to let my children feel like this in the place their supposed to be excited to learn in. This gave me the tools and tips I needed to give my kids the best chance at success in school and later in life: http://teachyourchildtoread.blogspot.com/
Add new comment